Medical researchers, neurologists, experimental psychologists and
others studying visual perception often rely on mono- chrome or RGB
monitors for the presentation of visual stimuli. When used in this
manner, CRTs must be precisely calibrated to ensure that any observable
nonlinearities can be traced to the visual system of the3subject being
studied and not the display.
Vision researchers, however, are not the only ones who need well-calibrated
CRT (cathode-ray tube) screens. Users in graphic arts, TV broadcasting
and other professions also require accurate measurement of color
coordinates, correlated color temperature and the luminance of television
and computer monitors.
Color-matching test
The best device for quantifying and calibrating the color and brightness
of a CRT screen is a colorimeter (Figure 1), an instrument that
determines the amounts of red, green, and blue light that, when
additively mixed, match a test color in International Commission
on Illumination chromaticity coordinates. There are many different
types of colorimeters, most of which employ three color filters
and three detectors.
Colorimeter performance can degrade if excessive CRT light is lost
as it’s transmitted to the detectors, and spatial nonuniformity
(the variation in brightness and chromaticity between two points
on the screen) can produce measurement discrepancies.
To overcome these potential problems in its SLS 9400 handheld colorimeter,
Graseby Optronics of Orlando, Fla., studied several options. Product
engineers first considered traditional diffusing materials, such
as ground glass and opal glass. Opal glass spreads the light uniformly
through the color filters and onto the detectors, but it attenuated
the light emitted from the CRT screen, causing the loss of too much
signal. Without adequate signal to process, Graseby’s handheld
colorimeter would not be sensitive enough to measure very low light
levels, a customer requirement.
Ground glass proved even less effective. Mechanically etched so
that it essentially had a frosted surface, the ground glass failed
to produce the even field of light necessary to overcome spatial
nonuniformity, resulting in erroneous color measurements.
Finally, the engineers turned to a new optical solution, a holographic
optical element known as a light-shaping-diffuser. These surface-relief
holographic elements shape light by precisely controlling the energy
distribution along the horizontal and vertical axes, spreading light
evenly.
Located in a measurement probe that attaches to the display via
a vacuum-seal suction cup, the diffuser homogenizes and shapes the
light emitted from the CRT screen and transmits it through the instrument's
color filters and evenly onto all of the photodiode detectors (Figure
2). Thus, the instrument can manage spatial nonuniformity so effectively
that the measurement probe can be rotated in the same position on
the screen and still render the same precise X and Y chromaticity
values.
Uniform light distribution
Manufactured by Physical Optics Corp. of Torrance, Calif., the diffusers
distribute a uniform field of light across the detectors in a circular
pattern 1.7 in. in diameter. This is important because each of the
detectors, which are positioned adjacent to one another, must "see"
the identical sampling of light to process accurate color information.
The transmissive diffusers employed in the SLS 9400 have an angular
divergence of 65° and homogenize and transmit more than 90 percent
of the light emitted from CRT screens. Laminated on a glass BK7
substrate, the diffuser is protected from dirt and scratches by
a clear piece of glass on the outside of the measurement probe’s
suction cup.
First introduced in late 1994, the Graseby SLS 9400 has four detector/filter
combinations and achieves X and Y chromaticity measurement accuracy
of 0.002 over the full color range of a CRT. The software has a
data logger that programs the instrument to take automatic CRT color
measurements at regular intervals.
Meet the author
Scott Giancola is sales manager of Graseby Optronics in Orlando,
FLA. He has a bachelor’s degree in imaging science from the
Center for Imaging Science at the Rochester Institute of Technology.
|